Gwazi Tiger side shutdown
|
Cyclone_Phil Posted: |
ftr, yes I should take the report with a grain of salt, but nevertheless: http://www.screamscape.com/html/busch_gardens_tampa.htm Basically the waiting clock for the tiger side was removed and they 'bridged' the tiger tracks in the station to turn the tiger side of the waiting line into the new 'fast pass' line while the lion side is the same. What saddens and surprises me is the part about cannibalizing of 2 of the trains. I mean they are 2 yrs old, why would they need to cannibalize 2 trains (besides how they won't be needed if only the Lion side is running)? Finally, they mention something about adding topper tracks to smooth out the ride. I guess the only way to salvage gwazi in the future is to give it the full Rocky mountain treatment and replace the entire track with steel rails. On the plus side it seems they made some changes to Rhino Rally. I do look forward to it since it has been greatly diminished since the loss of the raft segment of the ride. * This post was modified at 1/13/13 11:25:00 PM * |
The park purchased new trains and there was no improvement. It was still the same lousy ride it's always been. I think it proved one point. Millennium Flyers are nice trains, but despite the claims of some enthusiasts, they don't improve the ride experience on a roller coaster that's already got issues.
The fundamental flaw with this roller coaster is that there is nothing memorable about the layout. I've ridden both sides numerous times and I can't remember the layout on either side, but yet I can for many other roller coasters. There is no signature element, pop of airtime or anything to speak of.
The other issue with Gwazi is the sheer number of operating hours. It's just like GhostRider at Knott's. That coaster has also been destroyed from the climate and the number of operating hours, but at least GhostRider had an awesome layout.
At this point I'd be fine if Gwazi went extinct.
* This post was modified at 1/14/13 12:53:24 AM *
To me the main thing is its the dueling aspect (yes hardly great compared to dueling dragons at IOA), but yes after that there's no redemption for the ride if only one side is running. For me if both sides are not running, I'm not riding it. I dunno for the racers and what the others thinks regarding those.
Otherwise, I can also live with them replacing it with a winged or hyper coaster.
* This post was modified at 1/14/13 3:00:48 AM *
You hit the nail on the head. The layout was designed for dueling, which never really worked well and I think the designer forgot to put in the elements that make a great wooden coaster because they were too focused on the dueling.
The issue from what I've read and heard is with the wood layered track not the structure and not the trains. Using the two extra trains for parts doesn't mean those trains are damaged or they are going to disappear entirely either.
I'm not convinced that the Iron Horse treatment is the solution for every wooden coaster that's in poor shape. Both rides that have the Iron Horse track have had major modifications to the layout and the result is really a brand-new ride. A lousy layout is still going to be a lousy layout with I-box steel track.
I suspect with Gwazi that guest survey scores are low, operating both sides is twice as costly, lines are too short to justify both sides, attendance certainly doesn't justify it for a large part of the year and maintenance costs are high. It's a mediocre turkey, so the park is giving up and directing the cost savings to other parts of the park.
* This post was modified at 1/14/13 4:31:10 AM *
Eric, fair enough. And as I said, if they tear down Gwazi, then so be it, I'm not going to miss it that much. Hell I would Not ride it if the wait is over 30min and that's being very generous for a mediocre wood coaster. I stand corrected about the trains. But I still find it odd about the cannibalization this soon. Shouldn't they have some extra parts on hand before they have to take apart parts from the other trains?
* This post was modified at 1/14/13 12:04:36 PM *
I didn't know there was a better side Rob. You both drive home my point about Gwazi being nothing to get excited about.
Eric_Gieszl said:
I didn't know there was a better side Rob. You both drive home my point about Gwazi being nothing to get excited about.
Tiger was more of a twister with more hops and laterals, whereas Lion was long stretches and sweeping turns... not unlike the difference between Fire and Ice at IOA.
I can't say that I'd actually miss Gwazi, though I'm glad we did get a few rides on it over the years.
As for cannibalizing the trains, if Busch Tampa has made up their mind that they are not going to run the Tiger track at all, it only makes sense to use the trains as parts. (they are never going to run more than 2 on Lion). But, I think it is important to note that I have never seen a park that starts taking parts from a train (ie Volcano/FOF/Avalanche/Skull Mountain) bring that train/s back. If the rumored 3 train operation on Volcano does happen this year, it will be a 1st.
Paul
alpengeistno3 said:
the only thing I can remember about the ride is the HORRENDOUS loading procedure.
LOL- That part is memorable! Busch Gardens/SeaWorld sometimes drives me nuts with their ride operations.
Two years ago I went to ride Gwazi and it was a three-train wait (single train operation) mid-November weekday. The wait was 20 minutes! Later the same day they added a second train so I rode it one more, but what I remember in particular was sitting on the brake run before the station for what seemed like an eternity.
The new trains made it worst in my opinion. Every bit of airtime or laterals that made the ride fun with the PTC trains was gone.
Did anyone ever get an answer as to why they have such an awful loading procedure? The only other ride I have seen with the same procedure is the Silver Comet at Martin's Fantasy Island on the US side of Niagara Falls.